I’ve never bothered to define it other than the study of the past
No favourites, just mentors and guides.
The letters of reference that worked.
Covid, crises in the Federation, and convincing all historians, regardless of their subjects or approaches, that they have a place in the CHA
Pay your membership dues
Historians are terrible prognosticators, but if the past is anything to go by I expect the future holds considerable realignment for the CHA, which will happily have little effect on the continued robustness of historical research in Canada
In keeping with the nature of a Proust questionnaire: footnotes or endnotes? I’m definitely team footnote, and am happy to have served as a footnote to the Canadian Historical Association.